On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:25:48 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> It's better if we stat() file that we are about to chown() at
> first and check if there's something we need to change. Not that
> it would make much difference, but for the upcoming patches we
> need to be doing stat() anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>
> ---
> src/security/security_dac.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/security/security_dac.c b/src/security/security_dac.c
> index 0dfe570..9b079e0 100644
> --- a/src/security/security_dac.c
> +++ b/src/security/security_dac.c
> @@ -271,17 +271,18 @@
> virSecurityDACSetOwnershipInternal(virSecurityDACDataPtr priv,
> path = src->path;
> }
>
> + if (stat(path, &sb) < 0) {
> + virReportSystemError(errno, _("unable to stat: %s"), path);
> + return -1;
> + }I'd like to see a more specific error message in terms of what is happening at the point stat was called. Otherwise the message might be too confusing at this point since it might have failed due to lack of permissions actually. Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
