On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 08:39:06PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> We already require and use glib >= 2.36 so there is no reason to keep
> around code to ensure compatibility with glib oler than that.

'older'. Nice catch/cleanup, thanks!

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to