> >> Replies don't include your patch; however, I will note if you jump to > >> patch 13: > > > > What do you mean? Don't you see squash.patch in the attachment? (yes, I > > attached a patch instead of inlining it, the reason for that being that the > > patch is not particularly small and inlining it would disrupt the thread...) > > > > Oh - I meant when I reply to your patch with an attachment, I don't get > your attachment in the reply. So I guess it was a early morning and > feeble attempt to note that one had to go look at your reply in order to > get context!
Nah, it's just my poor English - I could have considered other meanings, I just went with the most straightforward without thinking about it much, it does make sense now that you helped to steer the light so it could dawn on the marblehead. Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
