Hi Peter,
Thank you for reply.
At 05/30/2018 08:00 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
[re-adding libvir-list]
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 19:36:10 +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Peter,
Sorry to trouble you offline.
Please keep conversations on the list, so that it does not get lost in
private inboxes.
Recently, I forced on the PCID feature in CPU and
found the SandyBridge didn't include the PCID feature
in libvirt.
commit cad8054ece285d1712880cd108e8a39f833f7e88
Author: Peter Krempa <pkre...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 8 12:43:07 2012 +0100
cpu: Add cpu definition for Intel Sandy Bridge cpu type
Just curious why did the commit not add the PCID directly?
I knew the SandyBridge CPU models in QEMU also
didn't include the PCID feature.
I want to know:
- If we can't make sure PCID was supported in all SandyBridge?
- If we avoided PCID definition intentionally ?
- If we forgot to add it, and need to be fixed?
Qemu added it later than libvirt added the sandy-bridge cpu:
commit 434acb817b8ae747f31e91ec152f9f47ac514433
Author: Mao, Junjie <junjie....@intel.com>
Date: Fri Jul 20 07:08:21 2012 +0000
Recognize PCID feature
This patch makes Qemu recognize the PCID feature specified from configuration or command line options.
Jiri Denemark already covered why we can't/will not change existing
models in cpu_map.xml
Yes, I see, thanks you so much.
Thanks,
dou
Thanks,
dou
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
