[Just found out I got couple of mails lost, so resending even though it was sent a week ago]
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 05:21:17PM +0800, Luke Yue wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 10:08 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:12:57PM +0800, Luke Yue wrote: > Signed-off-by: Luke Yue <luked...@gmail.com> > --- > src/test/test_driver.c | 41 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > This patch looks fine, but it would be good to have tests for it also. The good thing is that thanks to the fact that this is a test driver API the check can be done using just virsh, no need to write tests and mock syscalls. The previous patches added at least some checks, because it was already in some other test codepath, but this (and later ones as well) are going to need to have some new ones added.Thanks for the review! It seems that there is no command in virsh uses virDomainGetSecurityLabelList, should we add one? Or is there any other testing methods?
You can add a command, or you can just write a small program that checks it. The former approach would require a round of design so that it is sensible for virsh to have such command, however the latter approach would add a whole extra binary to the build just to call one API. LLet's see what others think. I think we should definitely test it, especially when it can share most of its codepath with qemu and others.
Thanks, Luke
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
