2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette <clala...@redhat.com>: > With the change to make vshError() responsible for printing > all errors, there were some places in the code that would no > longer properly print errors. The good news is that the vast > majority of virsh was already printing errors, so this patch > just cleans up the rest of the users to make them consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clala...@redhat.com> > --- > tools/virsh.c | 228 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) >
The patch as is look good, but I wonder how you spot all those places that missed a vshError call. Did you manually go over the whole virsh.c file and checked all libvirt API calls? I just spot calls to virDomainMigrate and virDomainMigrateToURI (around line 3040) that are not matched with a call to vshError, you might want to fold that into your patch. ACK. Matthias -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
