> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c > > index 6140f0f..c527bb7 100644 > > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c > > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c > > @@ -2972,7 +2972,11 @@ cleanup: > > * pretend we never started it */ > > virCommandFree(cmd); > > VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(logfile); > > - qemudShutdownVMDaemon(driver, vm, 0); > > + /* The vm may be cloesd in other thread, so we should check whether the > > s/cloesd/closed/ > > > + * vm is active before shutdown. > > + */ > > + if (virDomainObjIsActive(vm)) > > + qemudShutdownVMDaemon(driver, vm, 0); > > I'm still playing with this patch, but at first glance, it is making > sense to me.
The patch makes sense to me, since we may unlock the domain object several times before we get to the cleanup code. Thus the state may have changed by the time we get there. Eric, what is the result of you playing with the patch? Is it ok to ack and push it? Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
