On 2012年04月28日 17:06, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote:
It doesn't break out the "for" loop even if duplicate pool is
found, and thus the "matchpool" could be overriden as NULL again
if there is different pool afterwards.
To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-April/msg00150.html
---
src/conf/storage_conf.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
ACK
Michal
Thanks, pushed.
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
