On 11/14/2012 09:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:06:08PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> I've proposed both approaches in the past. However, none of them was >> accepted as we ought to agree on $subj first. Frankly, both makes sense >> to me, both has advantages and disadvantages. >>
> IMHO, we should focus solely on interface address configuration > and aim to provide an API equivalent to getifaddrs(3). This means > > - Name > - Type > - Prefix > - Address > - Broadcast addresss or P2p destination address > - Hardware address > > and nothing more, in a fixed struct. Using a fixed-size struct works for me as well. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
