Hi, Shawn,
On 2012年11月16日 21:24, Shawn Furrow wrote:
Osier,
Thanks for including me in the review of this patch. I can tell right
away that your implementation is better. It's more modular and well
documented. When I submitted my patch about a month ago, it was
basically just me submitting the changes that I made to get ivshmem
working for my lab. We were on a tight deadline and so a lot of the code
is rushed and poorly pieced together. However, I am glad that my
submission has helped at least get the ball rolling on memory device
support for Libvirt as it is very much needed.
So do you see if the implementation satisfies your needs? I.e. Does
it work well in your lab?
Regards,
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
