> NACK this is putting inappropriate policy decisions into libvirt. > This may be how you want this scenario to work, but it is certainly not what > every user of libvirt will want.
How about adding some option to libvirt so that the users can choose policies? > If the storage is fubar & the management application wants to still start the > guest, they should change the XML config appropriately. I think that providing options is user-friendly rather than asking users to edit xml by hand after the storage is broken. Seiji -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
