Il 06/03/2014 09:06, Zhanghailiang ha scritto: > >> Il 05/03/2014 09:01, Zhanghailiang ha scritto: >>> Hi all： >>> >>> Currently, we use cgroup(memory) to support memory QoS on KVM >>> platform, and use "mlock" on qemu to support "memory reserved". >>> >>> The "mlock" seems to be not appropriate. >>> >>> Now qemu "mlock" memory in the main thread, which would lock iothread >>> (qemu_mutex_lock_iothread), if the memory size is large, that will >>> consume lots of time. >>> >>> It means whenever we want to set a new 'mlock', the VM would be >>> blocked for a while. >> >> I'm not sure I understand how the mlock-ed memory is used. Are you using a >> custom malloc, for example with g_mem_set_vtable? >> >> Paolo > > Hi Paolo： > > Thanks for your reply. > As you know qemu has an option "-mlock", I think it has some problems. > If we set "-realtime mlock=on", then qemu will mlockall vm's memory, It is a > very time consuming action, and it will block the libvirt api until it > finished. > so I think it is better to do 'mlock' asynchronously, the flow chart can be > described like below.
Is an asynchronous mlock valid for all workloads? Until the mlock finishes, there is no guarantee that the guest will have "real-time--friendly" response to memory allocation. > Is it ok? > Flow chart: > main funciton qmp command "set_ram_minguarantee" > | | > | | > create "mlock" thread change value of lock_ram_size > | | > | | > |------>thread wait<-------------wake up "mlock" thread > | | > | | > | | > |-------mlock(lock_ram_zie) Also, I'm not sure what the arguments to mlock are. How do you find the address range to pass to mlock? Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
