Gisle Aas wrote:
> The problem is that LWP's ftp protocol module tries to implement what
> RFC 1738 says:

-snip-
 
> Any ideas on what can be done API-wise to make LWP support both ways?

Easy. Have perl modules something like this:

use RFC;
no RFC::1738;

and so on. A generic way to handle all the specs that no one else implements!


Except what if you want to implement the Micro$haft "standard" at one point and
the Nut$crape "standard" elsewhere? Hmmm.

use Browser::MS::5.1.2.34789;
no Browser::MS::5.1.2.34789::URI::Relative::Random::Crash;

OK, maybe it isn't so easy after all. Oh well.

Reply via email to