On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 03:55:11PM -0400, Kristofer Coward wrote: > > Anyway, you don't have to go that far for an example, think of all the linux > > distrib who also ship non free sofware with it ? > > True, but the only non-free software living at a low enough level to be > considered part of the OS (that I can think of) is qt (which a lot of open That is a discution we best not have here, please. > source folk don't consider a threat to the movement). The rest is apps > (many of that being programs that do a job that no free software does > satisfactorily yet, and even accepted as a necessary evil by FSF.. unless > RMS has any objections to this statement) You could consider a lot of dæemons and other stuff also in this category. Friendly, Sven LUTHER
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Rick Moen
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Alejandro Forero Cuervo
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Arandir
- Re: GNU License for Hardware mark
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Justin Wells
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Kristofer Coward
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Arandir
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Stephen Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Kristofer Coward
- Re: gEDA: Re: GNU License for Hardware Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER