On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 12:27:53PM +0100, Martin Konold wrote: > Recent comments from RMS have shown that he does not accept the "system > component exception" anymore. That's not true. The "system component exception" was designed to let you link to proprietary libc's and libX11's on proprietary systems where you have little to no option. I've never heard RMS complain about that. It's when people interpret it to let them evade GPL that RMS gets annoyed, since it is very carefully worded to avoid that, and people rarely take note of the wording when they abuse it. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are. -- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: How To Break The GPL Mark Wells
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: How To Break The GPL John Cowan
- Re: How To Break The GPL John Cowan
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: How To Break The GPL David Johnson
- Re: How To Break The GPL Martin Konold
- Re: How To Break The GPL David Starner
- Re: How To Break The GPL John Cowan
- RE: How To Break The GPL Schilling, Richard
- RE: How To Break The GPL David Johnson
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: How To Break The GPL Schilling, Richard
- Re: How To Break The GPL Justin Wells
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: How To Break The GPL Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: How To Break The GPL cszigetv
- Re: How To Break The GPL John Cowan