David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Considering a GPL-compatible v2 of the QPL wasn't good enough.

Eh?  Who would not have been satisfied with a genuinely GPL-compatible 
QPL?
-- 
  __
\/ o\ Employ me! Cryptology, security, Perl, Linux, TCP/IP, and smarts.
/\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://www.cluefactory.org.uk/paul/cv/

Reply via email to