On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - copyright - whether written specifications
> for the operation of poker machines could be
> original literary works - whether the specifications were a product of the
> applicant's work, or simply reflected a common industry
> standard
Now I'm hardly an Australian lawyer, but it seems to me that there is
no problem. An implementation of the spec is not a derivative work any
more than a building is a derivative of it blueprints.
I would agree that specs can be copyrighted, but so what? If the poker
machine company were worried about look-alike ripoffs, then get a
trademark on the design, and don't try to squeeze copyright law into
shapes it was not meant to be in.
--
David Johnson
_________________________
<http://www.usermode.org>
