http://www.wegalink.de/english/download_c.html contains a licence which is claimed to be OSI certified, and looks like it may be derived from the X licence, although this is not stated. However, this licence requires the recipient of the software to have the documentation for the licence to be valid, but allows sub-licensing without this constraint. That means the documentation requirement can trivially be circumvented, making it of little value to include it in the first place. (The other problem in this case, I suspect, is that the copyright owner is not a "legal person".) -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.