On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, SamBC wrote: > Okay, this license is in the queue to be dealt with by the OSI board, but I > would like to start using it meantime without certification, and would > appreciate opinions... It's way too long and complicated to deserve the name "simple". Far from it! There are other OSS-like licenses for documentation that should fit your needs. Anything wrong with them that you want to use this one instead? -- David Johnson _______________________ http://www.usermode.org
- simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) SamBC
- RE: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) David Johnson
- RE: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) Dave J Woolley
- Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) SamBC
- Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) Rick Moen
- RE: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) Dave J Woolley
- Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL) nights