On 15 Jan 2001, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > You neglected to mention what your goals are. > Sorry. > If your goal is to make the software available to the public, but to > retain commercial control over it, then the AFPL is perfectly > reasonable. > This is my main goal (I think! ;-)). > If your goal is to build a community of unpaid developers around the > project, then the AFPL is not the best choice. > Secondary, but it would of course be nice... Regards, Robert
- AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Robert Feldt
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Andrew J Bromage
- RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Lionello Lunesu
- RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Eric Jacobs
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Robert Feldt
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Scott Johnston
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? David Johnson
- RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Lionello Lunesu
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? David Johnson
- Re: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Chris Sloan
- RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses? Lionello Lunesu