> > The definition of "User" is too broad. It allows any > > Distributor to force someone to be a "User" simply by > > sending them a copy. > > But does it arm any part of the license ? Or just a personal feeling ? >
8.5 seems to have an effect for "Users" 15 may also. 16 also, but 16 is hard to follow. Realistically, I think no court will find you had obligations if someone sent you a source without request. But what if someone obtains the source for determination if it infringes a patent? Does the license allow them to inspect the software without obligating them to #16? How? -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3