Wilson, Andrew scripsit: > Interesting point, though. I'd speculate that if the embedded > "public license fallback" inside CC0 is ever sent to OSI as a > stand-alone license, it would be approved. It is mighty similar > in effect to MIT/BSD/Apache, with the distinctive feature that it > explicitly disclaims patent licensing, is clearly copyright-only, > and therefore non-duplicative.
I thought that was precisely why we rejected it. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org [P]olice in many lands are now complaining that local arrestees are insisting on having their Miranda rights read to them, just like perps in American TV cop shows. When it's explained to them that they are in a different country, where those rights do not exist, they become outraged. --Neal Stephenson _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
