2017-06-18 10:59 GMT-04:00 Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de>: Is it deliberate or accident that the GPLv1 is not on > https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical ? What’s > the stance on it? >
The GPLv2 was grandfathered, but licenses normally have to be submitted to OSI by the steward, so you'd have to talk to the FSF. Do substantial parts of your material lack the phrase "or, at your option, any later version" in their copyright notices? If not, then this would be a simple solution. I would support its recognition and placing in the "historic" category, for what that's worth. The differences as shown by wdiff are chiefly editorial, with the exception of sections 7 and 8 of the GPLv2, which don't exist in GPLv1. -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker saying "No information items inside". --Eve Maler
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
