On Monday 04 October 2004 07:53, Thomas Reitelbach wrote: > On Monday 04 October 2004 05:47, Malte Gell wrote: > > Hello, > > thanx for the new release, nice to see integrated gpg support. With > > earlier versions i used Richard Hirner's gpg-patch and it needed a > > direct connection between the clients to work. Does this still > > apply to licq 1.3.0 or can gpg encryption be used without direct > > connection? > > I have never used Richards patch nor the integrated support for gpg. > But what you see in Licq 1.3 _is_ Richards patch, we just permanently > integrated it. There has not been spent that much work on it, and so > it still has the same requirements.
I already guessed it is Richard's patch ;-) I just remembered something Richard said gpg encryption only works with direct connections, but as Jon says it works through the server as well which sounds good. Malte
pgpWnPiEvf06w.pgp
Description: signature
