Erik Sandberg writes: > My thought with the initial naming was to create something minimal
Yes, minimal is good. > About priority: I like your suggestion, but I would like to add the current > "important" between normal and regression (& I realise that the currently > "critical" bugs should be placed there as well). Just so we have two levels > of normal bugs. Ok, the most `important' thing I wanted in was: regression. > About resolution: Is this really necessary? When they do occur, > "unclear" combined with a texidoc comment would do fine, IMO. Maybe not. Agreed. > :) Discussion is good. My goal is to minimise my own work while not > increasing your work; please feel free to tell me whenever I don't > succeed in doing the latter. Hmm, I did't do the latter :-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
