Wol's lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> writes: > I've just tried to do a cut-n-paste into a piece of music, from > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/bars > > At the very bottom you'll find > > \relative c' { > c1 \mark \markup { \musicglyph "scripts.segno" } > c1 \mark \markup { \musicglyph "scripts.coda" } > c1 \mark \markup { \musicglyph "scripts.ufermata" } > c1 > } > > Okay, I was only copying the markup bit - I wanted it as markup in the > middle of the bar - but I had to add a # as follows: > > \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.coda" } > > Looking at the code behind the web page, it looks like that is > correct, so this is really just a curious enquiry - why is the # > required if I want a markup, but it's not required if it's a markup > within a mark ???
Different versions. It's just recently that you could write strings within a markup without # before them. The Documentation is likely newer than your version of LilyPond. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
