-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van:    Simon Dahlbacka

>> On 5/10/06, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> There's a lot of data used in lily. It would require quite some effort to
>> build the model you're suggesting, and someone would need to maintain the
>> model (which is changing all the time). I think all the current developers
>> have better things to do, but I nothing stops you from writing such
>> documentation.

> the only sane way to do such a thing would be to auto-generate the data by
> parsing the source or something so it would be updated "with the click of a
> button". Personally, I don't have the extra time to build such a scraping
> tool..

There is no need to write one. I got myself the lily source of cvs and 
downloaded Doxygen. This creates lots of nice graphs and object hierarchies 
from the .cc and .hh files. It also shows links between and even definitions of 
the classes.




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to