On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd advise to generate postscript, and then convert the postscript to >> png (with transparancy!) using >> >> gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pngalpha \ >> -sOutputFile=score-page%1.png -r101 score.ps >> >> (For the best compatibility, run lilypond with --verbose and copy the >> 'Converting to PNG' command, substituting pngalpha for png16m.) >> >> Maybe LilyPond could add pngalpha as a generation target? > > Is there a reason to not always use pngalpha ?
commit 7f595671928233af9d1c76c5cb400f2010c65b72 Author: hanwen <hanwen> Date: Mon Sep 5 14:12:00 2005 +0000 (make-ps-images): use png16m again, for sake of IE users. How does IE deal with pngalpha images today? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user