Isn't that basically what I just said? I guess you just worded it more
eloquently than I;)
ck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R. Bhakti Klein
>
>
> i'm thinking it has something to do with the fact that in the first
> example, you're modifying a variable, whereas in the second one, you're
> modifying the contents of a field cast member, which is treated
> differently by lingo.
> -bh
>
> Colin Kettenacker wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > The direct access to the cast member's text in your second
> example is weird
> > and wonderful though. Too bad it is not consistant with the
> first example
> > you gave. Just a lingo quirk I guess.
> >
> > [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
> > http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
> > email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
>
> --
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
