> Um, okay. I'm sure James Newton and the other authors of the behavior
> libraries will appreciate your term "bloated crap".
I was having a bad day that day. Apologies to James Newton, all coders who
built the behaviours and anybody else who may have taken offence...
There are still a few probs with the in-built behaviours though. I don't
know whether it's because I do know Lingo well or what, but, for example, it
seems to be nigh-on impossible to get the Multiuser Server stuff to do
anything other than the 5-minute chat. It's not too much of a problem
because I have my own version now, but it proved to be a major set back for
a prototype project that was due in. As a result I personally found that
entire MUS library to be useless.
A lot of the behaviours are great for the newbies, but there is the
occasional one, like the MUS stuff, that nobody can use because it is *too*
generic.
Any other opinions?
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
