It seems to me that Macromedia's implementation of OOP is quite
vague/flexible (depending on your point of view). I use smalltalk, java
and objective c - there is no reason why you can't implement any OOP
technique, even protocols and categories. I've always thought of
behaviours as a kind of object - you can do things like overriding the
new method - just think of attaching a behaviour to a sprite as having
implicitly initialized an object.
But your right it is a moral rather than practical debate...
JMTCW
Pete
On Friday, June 29, 2001, at 03:12 PM, faisal moro wrote:
> Hi all,
> i have a moral doubt here.
> I'm working on a project that i fully developed with objects.
> So, they act beetween themselves, everything works fine.
> But - of course - these objects must give some visual feedback of their
> work on the screen, so i linked to them their relative sprites.
> Now, here's the question, as i consider sprites as objects projections
> and not as objects themselves (they even link themselves to the object
> dynamically), is it legal to access their properties directly from the
> object or should i build some handlers to return needed data?
>
> Doei
> Faisal
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Why do i have to keep reading these technical manuals?" - Roger Waters
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
> http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
>
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
