On 2011-02-10 13:27, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote:
>> snprintf is standard, and should be about as safe as it gets with the
>> glibc functions.
>
> But snprintf is not like strlcpy.
It is indeed uglier to write 'snprintf(dst, size, "%s", src)' instead of
'strlcpy(dst, src, size)', but both the effect and the return value should
be identical.
/Bellman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
