On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:19:28 +0100 (CET) Jan Engelhardt <jeng...@medozas.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 2012-02-23 10:57, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > But there's more, > >> > >> 24931 ? S 0:00 \_ [btrfs-endio-met] > \_ [kconservative/5] > \_ [ext4-dio-unwrit] > >> > >> [with a wondersome patch:] $ grep Name /proc/{29431,29432}/stat* > >> /proc/29431/status:Name: btrfs-endio-meta-1 > >> /proc/29432/status:Name: btrfs-endio-meta-write-1 > Name: kconservative/512 > Name: ext4-dio-unwritten > > > >doh. The fix for that is to have less clueless btrfs developers. > > And truncate their names to SUNWbtfs, ORCLintg and EXT4diou? > I think not :) Teach ps(1) to look in /proc/pid/status for kernel threads? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html