On fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:21:24 +0800, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote: > The comment is for btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier, not for > btrfs_attach_transaction. Fix the typo. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shh...@gmail.com>
My miss, sorry. Acked-by: Miao Xie <mi...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > index 0544587..6d4c595 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle > *btrfs_attach_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root) > } > > /* > - * btrfs_attach_transaction() - catch the running transaction > + * btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() - catch the running transaction > * > * It is similar to the above function, the differentia is this one > * will wait for all the inactive transactions until they fully > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
