yep required optimization. Deleting from my todo list. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com> On 02/16/2016 01:34 AM, David Sterba wrote:
We should avoid duplicating the device constraints, let's use the btrfs_raid_array in btrfs_check_raid_min_devices. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index a67249582a6f..8fee24f92574 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -1730,6 +1730,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, { u64 all_avail; unsigned seq; + int i; do { seq = read_seqbegin(&fs_info->profiles_lock); @@ -1739,22 +1740,16 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits; } while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq)); - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) && num_devices < 4) { - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID10_MIN_NOT_MET; - } - - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) && num_devices < 2) { - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1_MIN_NOT_MET; - } + for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++) { + if (!(all_avail & btrfs_raid_group[i])) + continue; - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5) && - fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 2) { - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID5_MIN_NOT_MET; - } + if (num_devices < btrfs_raid_array[i].devs_min) { + int ret = btrfs_raid_mindev_error[i]; - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) && - fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 3) { - return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID6_MIN_NOT_MET; + if (ret) + return ret; + } } return 0;
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html