"Everest K.C." <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Good morning, >> >> This is a case of old english vs. new english. Using "implementors" is still >> correct. Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the >> kernel tree. Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not >> move >> forward with this patch. > I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor". > Should I create a patchset for it ?
Honestly, given that "implementor" is correct, this really doesn't seem like it is worth the effort and churn. jon
