On Friday 11 September 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2009-09-11 23:45:01, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > 2009/9/11 Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>: > > > > > >> And why suspend of mmc should generate card removal ?? > > > > > > Card is powered down during suspend -> mmc can't guarantee the card is > > > same and unchanged -> it makes some sense to simulate > > > removal/reinsert. > > > > But how is this going to work when I keep the device mounted and > > blockdev is basically destroyed - what if I'm reading file from card > > during suspend ? > > "Don't do it". > > > >> if I suspend and resume my laptop and I keep the card inside - all > > >> those step looks plain wrong. > > > > > > Unfortunately system can't tell. > > > > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume - if > > some users wants to crash his card by randomly swapping it during > > suspend/resume - I'd have no problem with that.... > > Well, I do have small problem with that :-). > > Anyway, patch for rechecking IDs would probably be accepted,
By whom exactly? > but that's not how it works now. Indeed. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
