On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> When sdhci is runtime_suspended, it can still receive a wake-up
> because of card insertion.
> The wake-up will then be signaled by an interrupt which cannot be serviced
> immediatly, as the device is powered off, and register are not accessibles.
>
> We cannot call pm_runtime_get_sync() in irq context as on some architecture
> (e.g. intel_mid),
> runtime_resume can lead to too much latency, due to e.g. PLL warm-up and such
> aggressive
> power gating.
>
> We temporarly disable the interrupt, and trigger a runtime_resume of the
> device
> The interrupt will be re-enabled when resume is finished.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Tardy <tar...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c | 8 +-------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h | 2 ++
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 735c3f7..85a1956 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1599,6 +1599,21 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> u32 intmask;
> int cardint = 0;
>
> + /* we might come from a sd insertion or sdio irq wake.. */
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended()) {
> + host->waking_up = 1;
> + /* Note that we disable temporarly the interrupt until we do the
> + * resume. If we don't then we'll get constantly interrupted
> + * until we actually resume.
> + *
> + * as the irq is shared, this might not be very friendly to our
> + * irq sharers but the pm_runtime workqueue should really be
> + * called soon.
Instead of disabling the IRQ, would it be possible to tell the device
to stop generating an interrupt request?
> + */
> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> + pm_runtime_get(host->mmc->parent);
Does this pm_runtime_get() have a corresponding pm_runtime_put()? I
didn't notice one anywhere.
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> spin_lock(&host->lock);
>
> intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> @@ -1747,7 +1762,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_enable_irq_wakeups);
>
> int sdhci_runtime_suspend(struct sdhci_host *host)
> {
> - /* nothing to do yet */
> + u8 val;
> + /* make sure we wake up on sdcard insert/remove enabled */
> + val = SDHCI_WAKE_ON_INSERT | SDHCI_WAKE_ON_REMOVE;
> + if (host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ)
> + val |= SDHCI_WAKE_ON_INT;
> + sdhci_writeb(host, val, SDHCI_WAKE_UP_CONTROL);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1768,6 +1788,14 @@ int sdhci_runtime_resume(struct sdhci_host *host)
> sdhci_set_ios(host->mmc, &host->mmc->ios);
> mmiowb();
>
> + if (host->waking_up) {
> + host->waking_up = 0;
> + /* Re-enable the irq now we are perfectly resumed.
> + * Any yet unhandled interrupt (i.e. the wake) will retrigger
> + * irq
> + */
> + irq_enable(host->irq);
> + }
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_runtime_resume);
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index e3c7fc0..17aeda3 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1325,8 +1325,8 @@ sub process {
> $prefix = "$filename:$realline: " if ($emacs && $file);
> $prefix = "$filename:$linenr: " if ($emacs && !$file);
>
> - $here = "#$linenr: " if (!$file);
> - $here = "#$realline: " if ($file);
> + $here = "" if (!$file);
> + $here = "" if ($file);
>
> # extract the filename as it passes
> if ($line =~ /^diff --git.*?(\S+)$/) {
> @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ sub process {
> next;
> }
>
> - $here .= "FILE: $realfile:$realline:" if ($realcnt != 0);
> + $here .= "$realfile:$realline:" if ($realcnt != 0);
>
> my $hereline = "$here\n$rawline\n";
> my $herecurr = "$here\n$rawline\n";
>
Surely this doesn't belong in the patch.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
