On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 03:12:25PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:46:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 04:44:09PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:26:39PM +0200, Koen Beel wrote:
> > > > I send the patch as attachment for now.
> > > 
> > > Fine with me in this case...
> > > 
> > > > But I'll have to look into another way of doing this. Corporate mail
> > > > system is adding stupid disclaimers, gmail web ui is not working ok
> > > > and corporate firewalls avoid using a different smtp server...
> > > 
> > > Good luck with that!
> > > 
> > > About the patch itself: I didn't verify the formulas, but it does solve 
> > > one
> > > special problem here. Thanks a lot! So:
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de>
> > > 
> > > @chris: If Shawn also likes the patch, I think this is a stable candidate.
> > > 
> > Thanks for the fixing, Koen.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn....@freescale.com>
> 
> Well, maybe not. My colleague complained and I think he is right that we are
> mapping div2 from the range 0 to 256 (inclusive!) to an 8-bit range. This must
> be wrong for one value per se.
> 
If you look at the context of the patch, you will find it's 'div2 - 1'
than 'div2' gets written into register.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to