Hi Konstantin. On 05/10/2012 11:46 PM, kdorf...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon, > I see 2 issues with new patch: > 1. New code starts BKOPS always with waiting for BUSY. (see comment below > in the code) > 2. Runtime suspend (mmc_suspend_host) do not checks that BKOPS is in > progress, > this means, that CMD5 (slee) will fail. You're right. it needs to check in progress. I will add them. > > > In your previous patch (v7) was code: > > - cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC; > + cmd.flags = MMC_CMD_AC; > + if (index == EXT_CSD_BKOPS_START && > + card->ext_csd.raw_bkops_status < EXT_CSD_BKOPS_LEVEL_2) > + cmd.flags |= MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1; > + else > + cmd.flags |= MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B; > > When level of raw_bkops_status is not critical, the host controller flags > used > without waiting for BUSY line release. This means, that mmc queue thread > will continue > to fetch requests while BKOPS still running on the card. > Without this code, BKOPS will always be blocking till BKOPS done and using > HPI for interrupt BKOPS on > new request is not need. > Why you removed this code? You're right. it's my mistake. Actually i modified to use with __mmc_switch(). As I remember, maybe you mentioned this point. right? So i tried to use based on your review. it's missing in this patch. Thank you for your comment. any other comments? If you have others, let me know, plz. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
