On 08/22/2012 04:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 22 2012, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> The following is what I have on my mind.
>>
>> broken-cd    cd-gpios        implication
>> -------------------------------------------
>> no           no              SDHCI CD
>> no           yes             GPIO CD
>> yes          no              NO CD / Broken CD
>> yes          yes             Invalid
>>
>> yes: property presents
>> no: property does not present
> 
> This matches Mitch's last suggestion exactly -- I think we're all agreed
> on these properties now.  The only remaining question is how to handle
> the pinctrl for CD in Thomas's case.

Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but I assume the standard
non-removable property overrides any of those, or is invalid in
combination with any of those?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to