On Wednesday 20 November 2013, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>         const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
>         struct tmio_mmc_data *pdata;
>         struct tmio_mmc_host *host;
> +       struct resource *res;
>         int ret = -EINVAL, irq;
>  
>         if (pdev->num_resources != 2)
> @@ -84,6 +85,13 @@ static int tmio_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                         goto out;
>         }
>  
> +       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +       if (!res)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* SD control register space size is 0x200, 0x400 for bus_shift=1 */
> +       pdata->bus_shift = resource_size(res_ctl) >> 10;
> +
>         ret = tmio_mmc_host_probe(&host, pdev, pdata);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto cell_disable;

Unfortunately, this has introduced a build error, since you use
an incorrect variable name (res_ctl vs. res) in the last line that
was added.

Please add a fix on top.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to