On 04/23/2014 01:08 PM, Russell King wrote: > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
A patch description would be useful so I can work out why... > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > config MMC_SDHCI > - tristate "Secure Digital Host Controller Interface support" > - depends on HAS_DMA > + tristate > help > This selects the generic Secure Digital Host Controller Interface. > It is used by manufacturers such as Texas Instruments(R), Ricoh(R) ... it's useful to remove that depends from here and ... > config MMC_SDHCI_TEGRA > tristate "SDHCI platform support for the Tegra SD/MMC Controller" > - depends on ARCH_TEGRA > - depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM > + depends on ARCH_TEGRA && HAS_DMA ... duplicate it in all the HW-specific drivers. On Tegra (and I believe at least any ARM system), I think HAS_DMA is always true, so is there a need for "&& HAS_DMA" at all, now that this statement is pushed into arch-/HW-specific options? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
