On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sas...@voltaire.com> wrote: > Hi Hal, > > On 06:20 Thu 24 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> >> There are unexplained cases of status 0x1c that have been observed >> for SL to VL mapping table setting as documented in "Re: qos on service-id" >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.rdma/1464 >> >> A subsequent patch will reintroduce this checking based on an additional >> option which will default to not do this. > > I think that addition of such sort of options (eg "--workaround-bugX") > should be avoided unless it is absolutely necessary.
I was thinking something like --qos-init-error with a description. > And even then more generic stuff would be better. > > In this specific case more generic option like: > '--resweep-on-failed-attr=11,15' (with reasonable default) will be more > useful for dealing with this and maybe another potential issues. Where else do you see this as being useful ? Is such flexibility really needed or is this more "just in case" ? -- Hal > > Sasha > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
