On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)
<dorfman....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling of MC create and delete traps
>
> For these traps the GID in the data details is the MGID and
> not the source port gid.
> So the SM should check that subscriber port has the pkey of the MC group.
> There was also an error in comparing the subnet prefix and guid due to
> host/network order mismatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <e...@voltaire.com>
> ---
>  opensm/opensm/osm_inform.c |  151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_inform.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_inform.c
> index 8108213..ae4fe71 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_inform.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_inform.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,103 @@ Exit:
>        return status;
>  }
>
> +static int is_access_permitted( osm_infr_t *p_infr_rec,
> +                               osm_infr_match_ctxt_t *p_infr_match )
> +{
> +       cl_list_t *p_infr_to_remove_list = p_infr_match->p_remove_infr_list;
> +       ib_inform_info_t *p_ii = &(p_infr_rec->inform_record.inform_info);
> +       ib_mad_notice_attr_t *p_ntc = p_infr_match->p_ntc;
> +       uint16_t trap_num = cl_ntoh16(p_ntc->g_or_v.generic.trap_num);
> +       osm_subn_t *p_subn = p_infr_rec->sa->p_subn;
> +       osm_log_t *p_log = p_infr_rec->sa->p_log;
> +       char gid_str[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
> +       osm_mgrp_t *p_mgrp;
> +       ib_gid_t source_gid;
> +       osm_port_t *p_src_port;
> +       osm_port_t *p_dest_port;
> +
> +       /* In case of GID_IN(64) or GID_OUT(65) traps the source gid
> +          comparison should be done on the trap source (saved as the gid in 
> the
> +          data details field).
> +          For traps MC_CREATE(66) or MC_DELETE(67) the data details gid is
> +          the MGID. We need to check whether subscriber has the pky of


                   typo  ^^^^

                           pkey


> +          the MC group.

Shouldn't this be the subscriber has a compatible pkey with MC group ?
The MC group has a full member PKey and the members can be full or
limited.

> +          In all other cases the issuer gis is the trap source.

                                               typo  ^^^
                                                       gid

-- Hal

> +       */
> +       if (trap_num >= 64 && trap_num <= 67 )
> +               /* The issuer of these traps is the SM so source_gid
> +                  is the gid saved on the data details */
> +               source_gid = p_ntc->data_details.ntc_64_67.gid;
> +       else
> +               source_gid = p_ntc->issuer_gid;
> +
> +       p_dest_port =
> +           cl_ptr_vector_get(&p_subn->port_lid_tbl,
> +                             cl_ntoh16(p_infr_rec->report_addr.dest_lid));
> +       if (!p_dest_port) {
> +               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> +                       "Cannot find destination port with LID:%u\n",
> +                       cl_ntoh16(p_infr_rec->report_addr.dest_lid));
> +               goto Exit;
> +       }
> +
> +       switch (trap_num) {
> +               case 66:
> +               case 67:
> +                       p_mgrp = osm_get_mgrp_by_mgid(p_subn, &source_gid);
> +                       if (!p_mgrp) {
> +                               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> +                                       "Cannot find MGID %s\n",
> +                                       inet_ntop(AF_INET6, source_gid.raw, 
> gid_str, sizeof gid_str));
> +                               goto Exit;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       if (!osm_physp_has_pkey(p_log,
> +                                               p_mgrp->mcmember_rec.pkey,
> +                                               p_dest_port->p_physp)) {
> +                               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> +                                       "MGID %s and port GUID:0x%016" PRIx64 
> " do not share same pkey\n",
> +                                       inet_ntop(AF_INET6, source_gid.raw, 
> gid_str, sizeof gid_str),
> +                                       cl_ntoh64(p_dest_port->guid));
> +                               goto Exit;
> +                       }
> +                       break;
> +
> +               default:
> +                       p_src_port =
> +                           osm_get_port_by_guid(p_subn, 
> source_gid.unicast.interface_id);
> +                       if (!p_src_port) {
> +                               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> +                                       "Cannot find source port with 
> GUID:0x%016" PRIx64 "\n",
> +                                       
> cl_ntoh64(source_gid.unicast.interface_id));
> +                               goto Exit;
> +                       }
> +
> +
> +                       /* Check if there is a pkey match. o13-17.1.1 */
> +                       if (osm_port_share_pkey(p_log, p_src_port, 
> p_dest_port) == FALSE) {
> +                               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG, "Mismatch by 
> Pkey\n");
> +                               /* According to o13-17.1.2 - If this 
> informInfo does not have
> +                                  lid_range_begin of 0xFFFF, then this 
> informInfo request
> +                                  should be removed from database */
> +                               if (p_ii->lid_range_begin != 0xFFFF) {
> +                                       OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> +                                               "Pkey mismatch on 
> lid_range_begin != 0xFFFF. "
> +                                               "Need to remove this 
> informInfo from db\n");
> +                                       /* add the informInfo record to the 
> remove_infr list */
> +                                       
> cl_list_insert_tail(p_infr_to_remove_list, p_infr_rec);
> +                               }
> +                               goto Exit;
> +                       }
> +                       break;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 1;
> +Exit:
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>  /**********************************************************************
>  * This routine compares a given Notice and a ListItem of InformInfo type.
>  * PREREQUISITE:
> @@ -351,15 +448,10 @@ static void match_notice_to_inf_rec(IN cl_list_item_t * 
> p_list_item,
>  {
>        osm_infr_match_ctxt_t *p_infr_match = (osm_infr_match_ctxt_t *) 
> context;
>        ib_mad_notice_attr_t *p_ntc = p_infr_match->p_ntc;
> -       cl_list_t *p_infr_to_remove_list = p_infr_match->p_remove_infr_list;
>        osm_infr_t *p_infr_rec = (osm_infr_t *) p_list_item;
>        ib_inform_info_t *p_ii = &(p_infr_rec->inform_record.inform_info);
>        cl_status_t status = CL_NOT_FOUND;
>        osm_log_t *p_log = p_infr_rec->sa->p_log;
> -       osm_subn_t *p_subn = p_infr_rec->sa->p_subn;
> -       ib_gid_t source_gid;
> -       osm_port_t *p_src_port;
> -       osm_port_t *p_dest_port;
>
>        OSM_LOG_ENTER(p_log);
>
> @@ -460,55 +552,8 @@ static void match_notice_to_inf_rec(IN cl_list_item_t * 
> p_list_item,
>                }
>        }
>
> -       /* Check if there is a pkey match. o13-17.1.1 */
> -       /* Check if the issuer of the trap is the SM. If it is, then the gid
> -          comparison should be done on the trap source (saved as the gid in 
> the
> -          data details field).
> -          If the issuer gid is not the SM - then it is the guid of the trap
> -          source */
> -       if ((cl_ntoh64(p_ntc->issuer_gid.unicast.prefix) ==
> -            p_subn->opt.subnet_prefix)
> -           && (cl_ntoh64(p_ntc->issuer_gid.unicast.interface_id) ==
> -               p_subn->sm_port_guid))
> -               /* The issuer is the SM then this is trap 64-67 - compare the 
> gid
> -                  with the gid saved on the data details */
> -               source_gid = p_ntc->data_details.ntc_64_67.gid;
> -       else
> -               source_gid = p_ntc->issuer_gid;
> -
> -       p_src_port =
> -           osm_get_port_by_guid(p_subn, source_gid.unicast.interface_id);
> -       if (!p_src_port) {
> -               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> -                       "Cannot find source port with GUID:0x%016" PRIx64 
> "\n",
> -                       cl_ntoh64(source_gid.unicast.interface_id));
> +       if (!is_access_permitted(p_infr_rec, p_infr_match))
>                goto Exit;
> -       }
> -
> -       p_dest_port =
> -           cl_ptr_vector_get(&p_subn->port_lid_tbl,
> -                             cl_ntoh16(p_infr_rec->report_addr.dest_lid));
> -       if (!p_dest_port) {
> -               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> -                       "Cannot find destination port with LID:%u\n",
> -                       cl_ntoh16(p_infr_rec->report_addr.dest_lid));
> -               goto Exit;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (osm_port_share_pkey(p_log, p_src_port, p_dest_port) == FALSE) {
> -               OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG, "Mismatch by Pkey\n");
> -               /* According to o13-17.1.2 - If this informInfo does not have
> -                  lid_range_begin of 0xFFFF, then this informInfo request
> -                  should be removed from database */
> -               if (p_ii->lid_range_begin != 0xFFFF) {
> -                       OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> -                               "Pkey mismatch on lid_range_begin != 0xFFFF. "
> -                               "Need to remove this informInfo from db\n");
> -                       /* add the informInfo record to the remove_infr list 
> */
> -                       cl_list_insert_tail(p_infr_to_remove_list, 
> p_infr_rec);
> -               }
> -               goto Exit;
> -       }
>
>        /* send the report to the address provided in the inform record */
>        OSM_LOG(p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG, "MATCH! Sending Report...\n");
> --
> 1.5.5
>
> There is still a problem with GID OUT trap that is not sent since source port
> was already removed.
> Patch will follow.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Reply via email to