On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sas...@voltaire.com> wrote: > On 14:30 Mon 05 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sas...@voltaire.com> wrote: >> > On 11:10 Thu 24 Jun , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: >> >> Event API should have been able to be used by libraries >> >> written both in C and C++. >> > >> > I don't know about such requirement. >> >> Are you saying it isn't a valid requirement to allow OpenSM plugins to >> be C++ based ? If so, why not ? > > I'm saying that there is no requirement for plugin API to support C++ - > obviously (following method names) plugin API was never developed for > using it in C++. > > Why not is another question - for instance in order to not deal with > C/C++ compatibility issues (such as castings, function names limitation, > linking mess, etc.)
Seems to me like being able to build plugins in C++ would be very useful and that the remaining issues to accomplish it seem relatively minor. Are you opposed to moving in this direction ? -- Hal > > Sasha > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
