On Friday 18 February 2011 01:20, Roland Dreier wrote: > This looks like a reasonable approach to me, although of course the SM > has no way of knowing it should update a port's node description if a > hostname changes. > What about the problem of multiple HCA's of the same type on a single host? Won't all of them get the identical node description? Mike, can you add something to handle this case?
(See my original feedback: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg04413.html and see Mike's response: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg04414.html Mike, I agree that doing something for the upstream is better than doing nothing, but I would still like to see the multiple-HCA case handled. I think this can be done by adding a query to the low-level driver to distinguish between HCAs). -Jack -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
