Any objection to merging this? Based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603264#c1 I think this is
the right thing to do these days.
-- 8< ---- snip ----
We want udev to create a device node under /dev/infiniband with
permission 0666 for rdma_cm, so add that info to our struct miscdevice.
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rol...@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
index b3fa798..3170899 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
@@ -1338,9 +1338,11 @@ static const struct file_operations ucma_fops = {
};
static struct miscdevice ucma_misc = {
- .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
- .name = "rdma_cm",
- .fops = &ucma_fops,
+ .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+ .name = "rdma_cm",
+ .nodename = "infiniband/rdma_cm",
+ .mode = 0666,
+ .fops = &ucma_fops,
};
static ssize_t show_abi_version(struct device *dev,
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
