> -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:h...@dev.mellanox.co.il] > > On 4/4/2013 2:45 PM, Weiny, Ira wrote: > > This changes the data sent by OSM_EVENT_ID_LFT_CHANGE. > > That event was just added and was experimental rather than being some > preexisting event already in some release.
Oh, sorry, I did not know it was not release yet... my bad. > > > I think this is a dangerous precedent. > > It's not setting this precedent. Sorry, Ira > > -- Hal > > > Even though plugins must be coded to specific versions of OpenSM I don't > think they will fail to compile with this change and users would get random > behavior when they try to use the event_data passed. > > > > I think it might be more appropriate to define a new event id say > OSM_EVENT_ID_LFT_BLOCK_CHANGE. > > > > Ira -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
