Was there a reason to define sm_key as an array of uint8_t's vs a be64_t? Wouldn't the following be better?
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com> --- include/infiniband/umad_sa.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/infiniband/umad_sa.h b/include/infiniband/umad_sa.h index eb7812d..32edf33 100644 --- a/include/infiniband/umad_sa.h +++ b/include/infiniband/umad_sa.h @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ enum { struct umad_sa_packet { struct umad_hdr mad_hdr; struct umad_rmpp_hdr rmpp_hdr; - uint8_t sm_key[8]; /* network-byte order */ + be64_t sm_key; be16_t attr_offset; be16_t reserved; be64_t comp_mask; -- 1.7.0.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html